History
Supporting Articles
Model Plans
Click the boxes above to select your page.
Green indicates the page you are on

Fafnir
The life history of a 1930 German Sailplane and of it's pilot, Günther Groenhoff
(updated 7th July 2010)

Researched by Vince Cockett in support of his scale radio control plans made freely available to all modelers

The Designer - Alexander Lippisch - (Nov. 2nd 1894 to Feb. 11th 1976)

Dr. Alexander Martin Lippisch was a German pioneer of aerodynamics who made important contributions to the understanding of flying wings and ground effect craft. His most famous design was the Messerschmitt Me 163 rocket-powered interceptor.

Lippisch was born in Munich, Germany. He later recalled that his interest in aviation was first kindled in September 1909 by watching a demonstration in Berlin by Orville Wright. He was, however, planning to follow in his father's footsteps and enter art school when World War I intervened. During his service with the German Army from 1915 - 1918, Lippisch had the chance to fly as an aerial photographer and mapper.

Following the war, Lippisch worked for a while with the Zeppelin Company, and it was at this time that he first became interested in tail-less aircraft. In 1921 the first such design of his would reach fruition in the form of the Lippisch-Espenlaub E2 glider, built by Gottlob Espenlaub. This was the beginning of a research programme that would result in some fifty designs throughout the 1920s and 30s. Lippisch's growing reputation saw him appointed the director of Rhon-Rossitten Gesellschaft (RRG), a glider research group.

So, why was it named the "Fafnir". Popular belief was that all the intricate planking on the fuselage was likened to the scales of a Dragon. However there is a more truthful story.

"Fafnir" was a collosus from a old german myth called "Nibelungensaga". Fafnir stood for the nature, power and also barbarism. He also had a brother bt the name of "Fasold". Fasold stood for intellectual, studies and culture All this is also a part of Wagner´s "Rheingold".

After the clash of the brothers Fafnir killed his brother and changed his image to that of a dragon in order to protect the treasure of the Nibelung. He would in turn be killed later by the German myth-hero Siegfried. Siegfried bathed in Fafnir´s blood and became invincible except for a small part of his shoulder.

Robert Kronfeld, the famous glider pilot and rival to Groenhoff, believed that the Fafnir was not very well constructed and that it took records because of the genius of its' pilot Groenhoff. Kronfeld therefore named his good natured double-seater"Professor", "Fasold". This amused Groenhoff a lot, but not Lippisch. The name "Fasold" also meant that Kronfeld acknowledged that the "Fafnir", with Groenhoff, would beat his new glider, the "Wien". Kronfeld then went on to name his new much larger glider, "Austria", after the name of his native country, declaring that Austria was much larger than its' city Vienna (Wien).

The Pilot

Günther Groenhoff was a highly respected glider pilot of his time and was the chief test pilot for the R.R.G at the Wasserkuppe. Due to a fatal accident in the Fafnir, his life was cut short at the young age of 23. You can read more about him here.

The Fafnir

Content on this page requires a newer version of Adobe Flash Player.

Get Adobe Flash player

This is very rare footage from 1st January 1932.
It is reasonable to assume that the 'unusual' landing is due to the fact that Groenhoff was unable to see forwards and had to kick the tail of the Fafnir round to allow him to see the landing strip.
The airfield is believed to be Griesheim/Darmstadt and the tow plane a GMG

The patterns of sailplane development had been dictated largely by the style of soaring which predominated at a given time. Through the 1920's and well into the 1930's ridge soaring was the predominant mode of flying. Designers, therefore, assumed that a glider would spend more time in lift than in sink, so their sailplanes were optimised for low sink speeds at low forward speeds, and with high maximum lift-to-drag ratio. Low wing loadings with thick highly cambered airfoils were considered necessary to achieve these desired low sink speeds. Even after the advent of thermal soaring, designers continued to employ low-speed performance in their sailplanes.

The Wing

With increasing sophistication of soaring techniques came the realisation that not only low sinking speed and high glide ratios, but also high manoeuvrability about the pitch and roll axes were required to take full advantage of ridge (and later, thermal) lift. Rolling inertia was minimised by using a strongly tapered wing plan form and by mounting the wing on top of the fuselage, closer to the centre of gravity, rather than on a pylon. For the first time Alexander Lippisch had an airplane of large span designed with self-supporting cantilever wings. These two-part wings which were slender and strongly pointed, would connect to a middle section, which was part of the fuselage, using three fittings. The wing was built in a cranked (gull-wing) configuration, ostensibly to provide ground clearance on takeoff and landing, an advantage with off-field landings and for improved stability in turns, but aesthetics may have been as much a factor in this design decision as aerodynamics.This gave the main plane considerable dihedral, after which the wing remains horizontal to the tips giving the appearance of a seagull. Their disadvantage was the high construction cost and the weight for the necessary additional reinforced spars. The wing had two spars and later a third was fit. A main box beam at the one-third chord position, with an auxiliary 'I' beams fore and later one aft and with the leading edge being plywood covered.

Following experience of the "Professor", Lippisch included quite a large amount of aerodynamic twist . The wings used three profiles which gave progressively less lift towards the outer tip and all blended into one another, namely:

Root Gottingen 652,
Mid-section Gottingen 535
Tip Clark Y (with a flat base.)


My 3-view above corrects many errors in previously published drawings
Click the picture to download a larger version or click here for a 1:10 scale pdf

The drawing has been modified to reflect newer information :-
1 - There are 2 versions of the aileron
2 - The rear wing spar was fitted during the rebuild following the fatal crash
3 - The tailplane fits square against stubs built on to the fuselage sides
4 - In 1930, the covering cap at the wing jpoint was clear plastic. See below
5 - Importantly, the wing has been totally revised with a shorter stub on the fuselage
6 - The rudder profile has changed
7- October 2014, the front fuselage shape is corrected and 1934 canopy improved.


These two pictures show the translucent cover strip over the wing joint
This is believed to allow the securing pins to be visibly inspected

Nose detail

In order to preserve an accurate wing profile, particularly in the area of the leading edge, the ribs on the Fafnir were more closely spaced than on other gliders Several degrees of washout were incorporated and in this way aileron effectiveness at low speeds was improved and premature stalling of the wingtips was avoided. Aileron effectiveness was further improved by maintaining a constant aileron chord length over about 80 percent of their span from the inboard ends. With the highly tapered plan form this resulted in increased aileron / chord differential and thus increased aileron effectiveness toward the tips. Differential movement of the aileron was also incorporated after its succsful application on the Wien.

It certainly was a remarkably sound machine and pleased it's producers enormously. Everyone was amazed with its high manoeuvring qualities, which was streets ahead of any other glider of the time. Although the Fafnir was decidedly on the heavy side, it showed itself to be a remarkably efficient machine with high manoeuvring qualities when in the hands of Groenhoff, the official test pilot at the Wasserkuppe who seemed very much at home in the machine, performing spectacular banked turns without any apparent loss of height.

picture from Flight Magazine

The Fuselage

The wing centre section was built into the fuselage with an elaborate curved fairing between the wing and fuselage made out of numerous small strips of plywood. This was to turn out to be a problem area for the Fafnir because of the potential for increased interference drag due to the proximity of wing and fuselage.

Previous designs of gliders had an open cockpit, but in order to reduce drag and protect the pilot from hail during meteorological research, a wooden canopy enclosure was constructed, being faired into the nose and wing roots. Portholes were included on either side to allow side vision only. Pilots of the time alleged that, one must "have the wind in your face", otherwise you are not gliding a superstition that would be weed out only slowly.The cockpit itself was tailor made to fit the small body of Groenhoff. The Fafnir also carried an external instrument for the measurement of humidity, in connection no doubt with the weather research work which was a big feature of the R.R.G. programme.

There was no landing wheel on the Fafnir, however the skid was cleverly sprung using a row of tennis balls trapped between the keel and the ash skid by wooden laths and around which was canvas or leather covering. Ground clearance all the way along the fuselage belly, and especially at the tail, was very small and this gave much trouble in service.

The Fafnir had quite a long oval fuselage covered in intricate plywood panels and had a rather small all moving tailplane set low down in the middle of the fuselage tail. This would later prove a problem to Groenhoff. The whole of the plywood paneling was finished in a high gloss varnish.

The Canopy and its' evolution

It has been a popular held belief that the Fafnir was given three different fuselage nose sections as depicted by Peter Riedel In his famous series of gliding books "Übersonnige Weiten" The image from this book which has been copied and representerd as a true record in many documents. However, this is not the complete story, as the following information will show.

The first version of the Fafnir, shown at the top of the drawing, is the ideal image of the glider with a complicated wing / fuselage fairing behind the cockpit, which was built up from many strips of ply.See this image from further below. This is also the version that appears on all the available 3-view drawings from the past, but the style was to be short lived.

This was not the first canopy, but a rebuilt version of the very first one, to try and overcome the problems of turbulence. The photos immediately below show the true first canopy to be fitted to the glider in 1930. The important point to notice about the shape is the tapering of the cockpit nacelle to a narrow point where it blends into the wing surface, whereas the next version at the top of the "Riedel" drawing has a parallel sided nacelle. Also a slightly more rounded port hole was provided on the side. The Balsa infill modifications shown below was made immediately after the first disappointing flight, which is reported in more detail further down this article.

Just one year later, at the Rhon Competition of 1931, the cockpit had been developed to it's shape depicted in the middle of the "Riedel" drawing on the left.

Following the ill fated crash, the nose was completely redisigned

So here, on the Left, are the definitive cockpit styles. Follow this link to view the images in full


In these two photos you can also see the Balsa in-fill and the early narrow cockpit top and wing fairing
which was all changed later to overcome the drag caused by the wing-fuselage transition.

Instrumentation

It was the opinion of a well-known German soaring pilot that no really successful thermal work could be carried out without a variometer. Bank indicators and longitudinal bubbles were fitted to several aircraft in addition to the more common compasses, thus making every provision in these machines for blind flying in clouds.

The instruments in the FAFNIR were manufactured by Askania and are worthy of special mention. In order to accommodate them all in the narrow space provided, types with narrow vertical scales were adopted where possible.

The FAFNIR also carried an external instrument secured to the outside of the fuselage below the starboard wing for the measurement of humidity, in connection with the research work which was a big feature of the programme of the R.R.G.

In this view on the left, the instruments are seen from the port side through the cockpit side opening. There is no actual 'panel', rather the instruments were mounted on a shelf above the pilot's knees. The layout of the instruments was staggered, those left of centre are set well back to allow placement of the compass, whereas right of centre they are positioned forwards, presumably to allow the two air canisters for the venturi to be fitted behind. The edge of one canister can just be seen in the photo to the right of the 'turn and slip'.

At the left is a liquid filled ball Compass and behind and to the right is the Turn and Slip indicator which has a spirit level to indicate bank angle at the bottom of the case and a needle to indicate the rate of turn. The instrument is linked to an air-driven gyro connected to one of the venturis on the starboard side of the nose.

Next to this is a Variometer with a large vertical scale. An Altimeter and an ASI were also installed, poitioned out of site to the right and were driven from the second venturi.

On the photos below you can see the fixing point for the calibration instrument with the two venturis mounted in the nose. It also shows the final fairing of the fiselage-wing transition to overcome problems found on the first flights.

Groenhoff ready to start - note the weather
calibration instrument on the side


Markings


Drawing based on Martin Simons 3-view

Flight Years of the Fafnir


Groenhoff prepares for flight at the Wasserkuppe

1930

The "Fafnir" was needed to be ready for the 1930 Rhön Competition at the Wasserkuppe and towards the end of its' build the craftsman Richard Mihm had to work day and night to get the glider finished in time.

The maiden flight was to prove a big disappointment. Following the launch, the glider proved to have no better glide ratio than that of a primary trainer. The problem was found to be the large fuselage to wing transition, coupled with the port holes which created strong eddies, allowing the airflow over the wing to tear off causing loss of lift and buffeting. According to Lippisch, the whole glider was shaking "like a lambs tail" and could even be seen frlom below by the spectators. Lippisch was under pressure from his friends to explain what was wrong with his glider, but he calmly brushed them off. However, the expressions on the faces of Lippisch's staff who stood around him, told him they urgently expected an answer to the problem

Lippisch went over to the workshop where the men were waiting for him and announced his cure. They were almost in tears when they had to cut apart again all the careful workthey had done. The work was carried out over night to insert blocks of Balsa to re-contour the transition, and with all this effort, the bird would be ready to go again tby the following noon noon.

On the next flight there was a noticeable improvement to the gliders performance. When it was bungeed off the slope in the second week of the 11th Rhön Competition, the Fafnir flew 15Km across the valley to Kreuzberg in 15 minutes and returned five hours later after fighting hard to sustain height on the way back to equal Kronfelds' world record set the week before. The Kreutzberg is a hill, 3,045 ft. (928 m.) high, 75 ft. (23 m.) lower than the Wasserkuppe, and is 9.5 miles (15 km.) to the south, with a lower hill, the Himmeldarlberg, lying between them.


1931

On the 13th. April 1931, after trying the new style aero-tow start with Peter Riedel in the tow plane, Groenhoff flew 138 km to Bühl

Hauling the Fafnir up the mountain.
A small group of people by the N.W. slopw on the left. Above is Mönch, whilst the Eiger is behind.
The N.W. edge over which the gliders were launched. Note the small group of people.
The Fafnirs' first launch. It has insufficient speed to get airborne and has already passed the Bungee and continues to on slide over the edge
The Fafnir hit a snow wall at the edge of the slope and tore off its' starboard tailplane
After 58 minutes Groenhoff succesfully lands the glider in a field close to Interlaken.

On the 4th May 1931, Groenhoff flew a record flight of 278 km from Munich to Kaaden, but it was not officially recognised because aero-towing had not been recognised by the FAT for such purposes. The "Fafnir" had been specially designed to research flight before and during thunderstorms,. Despite its relatively high overall weight (200kg) the wing loading was also relatively high (16.9 kg/m2), and the aircraft with its transparent delicate covering performed well.During this flight, in stormy conditions, the wing was badly holed by hail and accumulated quantities of ice and water which sloshed around inside. On this occasion he flew on until after darkness and in the end landed using his electric torch, poked out of the barely adequate portholes, to make his landing.

This report on the Junfraujoch is a short version. For the full report of this fascinating episode and in the words of Groenhoff himself, follow
this link

In June the Fafnir joined an expedition to the High Alps in an area known as the Jungfraujoch (Top of Europe). The gliders were carried up the mountain on the railway from Lauterbrunnen to the nearest station and then had to be man handled to the launch point at an elevation of 3454 m (11333ft). Launches were to be made by bungee from deep snow on the slopes of the Jungfraujoch. Some difficulty was experienced in finding a suitable terrain for the start. Owing to the depth of the snow it was impossible for the starting men with the bungee to run, so it was decided to use ten men on each side of the double 40m. starting ropes, but even so, in the rarified air and hampered by the snow, the Fafnir on its first attempt was unable to reach flying speed.

Groenhoff found himself sliding down the slope toward the slope precipice. He endeavoured to pull it off but because the tail of the Fafnir lies close to the ground. it was extremely difficult to put a positive angle of incidence on the wings with the machine isliding down hill. It then ran through a snow wall and to the horror of the launching crew the sailplane toppled over the edge and as it did so tore off half the elevator on the snow wall. The damaged Fafnir dropped into space, but after falling vertically for about 100 meters without hitting anything, sufficient airspeed was attained for the controls to respond and Groenhoff was able to pull out of the dive away from the rocks and out over the open valley. On more than one occasion he thought he would have. to jump with his parachute, and he prepared his camera to take a picture of the Fafnir as she spun down, but the prospect of losing the machine and landing amongst crevasses on the ice where he might be hurt and unable to move, deterred him.The cockpit covering the Fafnir only provides the pilot with a 200mm aperture on either side of the totally enclosed cockpit so that he was unable to look back to see what had happened to the tail. Shortly afterwards it went on its nose again and Groenhoff decided to see if he could keep it there by pushing the stick forward. This he succeeded in doing and came to the conclusion that the elevator must be working to some extent and that therefore, the faster he flew, the more likely he would he able to control its flight, so he flew the machine at about twice its normal speed until he could reach the centre of the valley where there would be enough height for him to use his parachute. The sailplane behaved normally, provided the airspeed was maintained. Hating to lose his beloved Fafnir he decided after all to try to save it. After a flight of almost an hour, Groenhoff chose a large fiat meadow close to Interlaken on which he made a very fast touchdown. A wingtip caught in the long grass and a severe ground loop resulted. The Fafnir slid for twenty meters sideways, and came to rest without further damage.

Two days later, with a new tailplane sent from the Wasserkuppe, Groenhoff again flew the Fafnir from the Jungfraujoch, this time gliding down to a landing which, by comparison with his previous escapade, was something of an anticlimax. Several days of poor soaring weather followed during which snow banks were built around the glider to protect it from the winds. On his first flight after this, Groenhoff found had no rudder control, but was able to get safely down into the valley, where it was found that during the launch the wooden block at the rear end of the fuselage, where the hold-back hook for bungee launching cord was mounted, had broken off and taken the rudder fixing with it. This had taken with it the main rudder mounting and brought the rudder itself out of its bearings. Only four flights were made by the Fafnir from this lofty launching point. Two of them had been nearly disastrous. The fourth, when Groenhoff soared away to land at Bern aerodrome was successful.

Digging snow walls around the Fafnir to
protect it from the elements
The Fafnir on a succesful flight over the Jungfau

On the 24th July during the 12th Rhön Gliding Competition Groenhoff achieved a record 220 km from a bungee launch at the Wasserkuppe winning him the Nehring--Gedächtnis-Preis of Bad Homburg as well as the Prinz-Heinrich-Rhönpreis for the greatest height gained (2,050 m.)

Groenhoff was to became only the third pilot in the world to gain the coveted Silver 'C' badge, after Kronfeld and Hirth.



Finally a succesful launch


See this rare footage of the Jungfrau expedition, spoilt only by the wrong glider being launched !!

1932

At the 1932 Rhön Competition came disaster. Several machines were involved in serious accidents including the Austria, Luftikus, Senator and the Fafnir. On the 23rd July Groenhoff attempted a flight under very unfavourable tailwind conditions the low-set horizontal tail unit was to be damaged once more.. He was bungeed downwind by a powerful crew, but on account of the great weight of the Fafnir he succeeded only with difficulty in getting off. During the last bounce the fuselage hit some rocks which smashed the bottom hinge of the rudder and damaged the underside of the fuselage. The damaged rudder partially jammed the elevators, but nevertheless Groenhoff managed to continue in flight for a distance of about half a mile, when the rear of the fuselage severed, and caused the machine to dive. One wing-tip struck a tree, whereupon the machine span round and side-slipped to the ground, coming to rest among some trees and supported on one wing. One wing broke off close to the root and the fuselage was badly damagedt. His death shook not only the glider pilots, but also the public who had taken great interest in him thanks to his results and his likeable appearance in the glider development

Groenhoff either jumped or was thrown out during the final spin round, and although the parachute opened, it was too late to save his life when his head struck a branch of a tree killing him instantly. It is generally believed that Groenhoff did not leave the machine voluntarily, and it is said that he was in the habit of flying without being strapped in, but at the same time it is difficult to account for the cockpit cover coming away unless he purposely released it to allow himself to be thrown clear. The condition of the sailplane after the accident made it appear very probable that the pilot would have escaped if he had been strapped in.

1933

Georgii and Lippisch, director and head respectively of the technical division of the RRG, decided to repair the remains of the Fafnir. This time the cockpit was built large enough to accommodate pilots of average size and the old wooden canopy was replaced by a transparent one. Peter Riedel flew the rebuilt Fafnir 228 km from Darmstadt into France in June 1933. Riedel, later in the same year, won the XIV Rhön contest and was awarded the Hindenburg Cup.


The Fafnir as it appeared on its debut in South America sporting the new enclosed nose and piloted by Peter Reidel.

A short video of a flight can be seen below

LEAD Technologies Inc. V1.01
The Fafnir sporting the Swastika tail


The rebuilt Fafnir wing showing the rear sub spar and the extra cross bracing in the aileron
Notice the wingtip modification on the Fafnir wing at the top of this picture.

1934

Hanna Reitsch (1912-1979), a pupil of Wolf Hirth and already on her way to become the famous German airwomen, flew the Fafnir in March 1934 with a 160 km flight from Darmstadt to Retlingen, a new course record for the women.

The same year, Peter Riedel, with the Fafnir, accompanied Georgii's, Hirth, Heini Dittmar and Hanna Reitsch on the expedition to Brazil and Argentina. The Fafnir achieved good cross-country soaring flights, the first accomplished in Latin America and on one occasion Riedel soared for seven hours over Buenos Aires. On return to Germany, the Fafnir remained in use far some years at Darmstadt, where the DFS, successor to the RRG, established its headquarters.

1938

The Fafnir was retired and was finally destroyed during a bombing raid at the Deutsche Luftfahrtsammlung (German Aeronautical Collection) at Berlin in 1943 along with many other famous aircraft.



References

Sailplane Magazine
Martin Simons - Sailpanes 1920-1945 published by Equip
Bernd Diekmann
Soaring Magazine March 1981
Flight Magazine Archive
Sturmvogel Magazine 1932
Vintage Glider Club newsletter No. 57 and No. 58